Legal Opinion

Suburban Real Estate Co. v. Silverton (Village)

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided January 28, 1929No. 3254PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HAMILTON, PJ.

"The plaintiff in error, The Suburban Real Estate Company claims its right to recover, from the defendant, compensation for the water mains, pipes, etc., first, under favor of sections 3966, 3967, 3968, and 3969 of the General Code of Ohio; and, second, for the reason that the defendant in error, the Village of Silver-ton, has appropriated for its own use the water mains, etc. in question, and, that, by reason of such appropriation, the Village should be required to make restitution or compensation.

The sections of the Code in question provide for the extension of water mains by…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Ford Realty & Construction Co. v. Cleveland (City)Ohio Court of Appeals · 1928

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Hightower v. City of TylerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1939
  2. City of Northglenn v. City of ThorntonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1977
  3. City of Danville v. Forest Hills Development Corp.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1935
  4. Selected Investments Corp. v. City of LawtonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1956
  5. Country Club District Service Co. v. Village of EdinaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1943

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API