Legal Opinion

People v. Van Dyke

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided February 28, 1969No. Gen. 68-89, 68-90PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Davis

The sole issue on this appeal is whether “Under all the circumstances disclosed in the record . . . the defendant was adequately represented by counsel.”

In the latter part of July, 1967, the defendant, Charles Van Dyke, was charged with various sexual offenses. He was unable to make bail and, consequently, remained in jail. Prior to indictment, he retained Carl Kuhn (herein called Kuhn) as private counsel, to represent him. Kuhn, and attorney John Lang (herein called Lang), who filed an appearance on behalf of the defendant, filed three petitions for a writ of habeas corpus, seeking his…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Powell v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. White v. RagenSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  3. Wade v. MayoSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  4. The People v. BursonIllinois Supreme Court · 1957
  5. People v. MorrisIllinois Supreme Court · 1954

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. People v. LawsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1994
  2. People v. ColonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1973
  3. People v. PendletonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1977
  4. People v. AnthonyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1975
  5. People v. BrownAppellate Court of Illinois · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API