Legal Opinion

B. Braun Medical Inc. v. Abbott Laboratories

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided June 30, 1995No. Civ. A. 93-3883PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM & ORDER

HUYETT, District Judge.

I. BACKGROUND

B. Braun Medical, Inc. (“Braun” or “Plaintiff’) commenced this action against Abbott Laboratories (“Abbott”) and Nypro, Inc. (“Nypro”) (Abbott and Nypro together, “Defendants”) alleging Defendants’ Luer Activated Valve (“NP LAV”) infringed U.S. Patent No. 4,683,916, assigned to Braun and entitled NORMALLY CLOSED AUTOMATIC REFLUX VALVE (“916 Patent”). Defendants’ First Amended Answer and Counterclaim set forth patent misuse as an affirmative defense and as the basis for a declaratory judgment and asked the Court to grant further relief.

Follo…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Edward B. Marks Music Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant-Appellee v. Charles K. Harris Music Publishing Co., Inc., Defendant-Appellee-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1958
  2. Security Insurance Company Of New Haven v. WhiteCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1956
  3. American Securit Company v. Shatterproof Glass CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1959
  4. Kenneth G. Smith v. John Lehman, Secretary of the Navy, Washington, D.C., and the United States Department of the NavyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
  5. American Securit Co. v. Shatterproof Glass Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 1958

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. B. Braun Medical, Inc. v. Abbott Laboratories and Np Medical, Inc., Defendants/cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
  2. B. Braun Medical, Inc. v. Abbott LaboratoriesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1999
  3. Larson v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API