Legal Opinion
American Securit Company v. Shatterproof Glass Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided August 24, 1959No. 12739_1PublishedCited by 48 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BIGGS, Chief Judge.
The background of the appeals at bar is complicated. 1 We begin with facts relating to the so-called “Toledo decree” as follows. The United States charged The American Securit Company, the plaintiff in the case at bar, and certain other corporate defendants, with violations of the antitrust laws of the United States in connection with certain patents for the tempering of glass owned or controlled by them. This resulted, on October 30,1948, in a final judgment by consent decree entered by Judge Kloeb in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio,…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- United States v. Paramount Pictures, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- International Salt Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Morton Salt Co. v. G. S. Suppiger Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Motion Picture Patents Co. v. Universal Film Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Automatic Radio Mfg. Co., Inc. v. Hazeltine Research, IncSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by48 opinions
- McCullough Tool Co. v. Well Surveys, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1965
- Engelhard Industries, Inc. v. Research Instrumental CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1963
- John P. O'Brien v. Westinghouse Electric CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1961
- Wham-O-Mfg. Co., a Corporation v. Paradise Manufacturing Co., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
- Hensley Equipment Company, Inc. v. Esco CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.