Legal Opinion

MacIoci v. Commissioner of Revenue

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided July 20, 1982PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNolan, J.

This case represents a test of certain procedures taken pursuant to the tax classification amendment, art. 112 of the Amendments to the Massachusetts Constitution, and its enabling legislation, St. 1979, c. 797. At issue is the propriety of the Superior Court judge’s findings and rulings regarding (1) certification by the Commissioner of Revenue (Commissioner) that the city of Fitchburg (city) was qualified to implement differential taxation of property by use classification for fiscal years 1981 and 1982; (2) implementation by the city of that program; and (3) failure of the city in 1981 to…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. United States v. Alice E. LeaheyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1970
  2. Litton Business Systems, Inc. v. Commissioner of RevenueMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981
  3. Bettigole v. Assessors of SpringfieldMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1961
  4. Dealtry v. Selectmen of WatertownMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932
  5. Leto v. Board of Assessors of WilmingtonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1964

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Sirrell v. StateSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2001
  2. Commissioner of Revenue v. BayBank MiddlesexMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1996
  3. Board of Assessors of Sandwich v. COMMR. OF REVENUEMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1984
  4. Evans v. Mayer Tree Service, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2016
  5. Crawford v. City of CambridgeMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1987

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API