Legal Opinion

Steen v. Weisten

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided March 31, 1908PublishedCited by 6 opinions

From Multnomah: Melvin C. George, Judge. This is a suit to set aside and annul the sale of a tract of land in Lane County; to recover $1,100 advanced as a part payment thereon, and to enjoin the collection of two certain promissory notes' amounting to $2,000 secured by mortgage on said property. From a decree in favor of plaintiff, the defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

*474Opinion by

Mr. Commissioner King.

This is a suit by Ole J. Steen against O. J. Weisten to annul the sale of .a tract of land in Lane County, to recover $1,100 advanced as part payment thereon, and to enjoin the collection of two promissory notes of $1,000 each, secured by a mortgage on the property, and comes here on an appeal from a decree in plaintiff’s favor.

1. The evidence discloses that in the early spring of 1905 Steen came from North Dakota to Portland, having in view the purchase of timber land, with the intention of engaging in the sawmill and lumbering business. After a brief…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Smith v. BayerOregon Supreme Court · 1905
  2. David v. MooreOregon Supreme Court · 1905

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Eichelberger v. Mills Land & Water Co.California Court of Appeal · 1908
  2. Horner v. WagyOregon Supreme Court · 1944
  3. McCabe v. KelleherOregon Supreme Court · 1918
  4. Nance v. McClellanTexas Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Carty v. McMenamin & WardOregon Supreme Court · 1923

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API