Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Bautista v. Los Angeles County

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 20, 2000No. Nos. 97-56074, 97-56341Published

1ConcurrenceReinhardt, Circuit Judge

Judge Schwarzer’s opinion reaches the correct result: the district court’s dismissal with prejudice of the plaintiffs’ -second amended complaint, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6), was erroneous. Dismissal with prejudice is proper under Rule 12(b)(6) only if it “appears beyond doubt that the plaintiff can prove no set of facts in support of his claim which would entitle him to relief.” Conley v. Gibson, 355 U.S. 41, 45-46, 78 S.Ct. 99, 2 L.Ed.2d 80 (1957). That is not the case here. The complaint set forth proper claims for employment discrimination based on age, race, and…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. Leatherman v. Tarrant County Narcotics Intelligence and Coordination UnitSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. Mchenry v. RenneCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
  5. Original Ballet Russe, Ltd. v. Ballet Theatre, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1943

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API