Legal Opinion

Doe v. ESA P Portfolio LLC

District Court, W.D. Washington

Decided March 5, 2024No. 3:23-cv-06038Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA 7 JANE DOE, also known as S.A.S., Case No. 3:23-cv-06038 8 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S 9 MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE SECOND v. AMENDED COMPLAINT 10 ESA P Portfolio LLC et al, 11 Defendant. 12 13 14 This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiff Jane Doe’s (“S.A.S”) motion to amend 15 her complaint. Dkt. 41. Because S.A.S. has met the liberal standard for amendment under 16 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15, the Court GRANTS the motion. The Court also DENIES 17 Defendant ESA P Portfolio LLC’s (“ESA”)…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Eminence Capital, Llc, and Jay Spechler v. Aspeon, Inc. Richard P. StackCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  3. Kowalski v. TesmerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  4. United States v. Hiram WebbCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
  5. George Wade and Joyce Wade v. Edward B. Hopper, IICourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API