Ross, Dependent of v. Ross

The principal question in this workmen’s compensation case is whether claimant, Hugh Daniel Ross, was the “wholly dependent” brother of the deceased employee, Henry King Ross. The attorney-referee awarded compensation, and the Commission affirmed *89Mm. From that order both claimant and the employer and carrier appealed. The former contended that the average weekly wages fixed by the Commission were too small, and the latter asserted they were too Mgh, and claimant was not wholly dependent upon deceased. The circuit court affirmed the Commission’s order in part, as to dependency, but modified…