Legal Opinion

Lopez v. McChesney

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided March 26, 1896PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal feom Circuit Judge, First Circuit.

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OP THE COURT BY

PREAR, J.

Tbis is a bill in equity to obtain a set-off of a judgment at law against a judgment in bankruptcy, on tbe ground tbat the assignee in bankruptcy declines to allow such set-off and is about to take out execution on his judgment against the complainant while the complainant cannot similarly enforce his judgment, against the assignee. The defense is that there was a plain*, adequate and complete remedy at law.

The facts are these. C. L. Brito was adjudicated bankrupt January 29, 1895, and E. ~W. McChesney was appointed his. assignee. February 8, A. J. Lopez filed…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Simson v. HartCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1816
  2. Hendrickson v. HinckleySupreme Court of the United States · 1855
  3. Puett v. BeardIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  4. Hobbs v. DuffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1863
  5. Gridley v. Garrison & FormanNew York Court of Chancery · 1834

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Yeiichi Miyashiro v. YapHawaii Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Hakalau Plantation Co. v. KahuenaHawaii Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Gay v. Haiku Fruit & Packing Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API