Legal Opinion
Hill v. Motley
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
Decided April 14, 1911PublishedCited by 3 opinions
Appeal from Warren Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the Court
Response to Petition foe Reheating by
Chief Justice Hobson.
In May v. Ferguson, 135 Ky. 414, we said:
“The old law was not satisfactory to the temperance of local option adherents, and, in order that the citizens in one part of a county might have a voice in determining whether or not prohibition should be enforced in another part of the county, the law was amended as above indicated so as to make the county the unit, and the only exception which the act' recognizes is that cities of the first, second, third and fourth class are made separate units, but in order for them to avail themselves of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Skain v. MilwardCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1910
- Stewart v. WurtsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1911
- May v. FergusonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1909
- Hill v. MottleyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1911
- Edwards v. PorterCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1910
3Cited by3 opinions
- Muncy v. DuffCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1922
- Ellis v. MeeksKentucky Supreme Court · 1997
- Taylor v. CookCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1912