Legal Opinion
Feinberg v. Saks & Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided September 28, 1981PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In an action to recover damages for, inter alia, false arrest and imprisonment and malicious prosecution, defendants Saks & Company and Norma Sanderson separately appeal from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Burchell, J.), entered July 15, 1980, as is in favor of plaintiff Doris Feinberg upon her cause of action for malicious prosecution, in the principal amount of $105,000, upon a jury verdict. The appeal brings up for review an order of the same court, dated June 27,1980, which denied the motion of said defendants to set aside the verdict on the ground that it…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Oakley v. City of RochesterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
- Oakley v. City of RochesterNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- Mullen v. SibleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
- Mullen v. Sibley, Lindsay & Curr Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1980
3Cited by20 opinions
- George R. Zanghi v. The Incorporated Village of Old Brookville, the Old Brookville Police Department, John Kenary and Kenneth WileCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
- Miloslavsky v. AES Engineering Society, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1992
- City of Mount Vernon v. Mount Vernon Housing AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- Johnson v. Target Stores, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2003
- In re the Arbitration between Amica Mutual Insurance & JonesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.