Legal Opinion

Pando v. Fernandez

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 13, 1986PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*496Almost five years later, the nisi prius court has again denied plaintiff injunctive relief which would restrain defendant from receiving or exercising dominion over the lottery proceeds. However, a review of the pertinent facts at this time leads us to the conclusion that only if the requested relief is granted will any prize money remain to ensure payment to the plaintiff if he is successful. All of the papers submitted demonstrate that there is indeed a likelihood of plaintiffs ultimate success on the merits. In addition, a balancing of the equities clearly compels the granting of…

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. Sau Thi Ma v. LienAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  2. Rosenthal v. Rochester Button Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  3. Buy This, Inc. v. MCI Worldcom Communications, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2001
  4. Sutton, DeLeeuw, Clark & Darcy v. BeckAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  5. Park Briar Associates v. Park Briar Owners, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API