Legal Opinion

Matter of Compensation of Brown

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided May 11, 1981No. 79-2895, CA 19235PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtVan Hoomissen, J.

In this workers’ compensation case, the claim was accepted and benefits were paid. After the claim was closed claimant’s request that it be reopened was denied.

Thereafter, claimant requested a hearing on the issues of his entitlement to additional benefits, penalties and attorney fees for resistance or delay, or, in the alternative, on the extent of permanent disability. ORS 656.283. Finding the claim had been prematurely closed, a referee ordered the claim reopened and that claimant be paid an additional 25 percent as penalty and $950 attorney fees. The employer requested review by the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. James v. State Accident Insurance FundOregon Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Dimitroff v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Vandehey v. Pumilite Glass & Building Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
  4. Pratt v. State Accident Insurance FundCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977
  5. Smith v. Amalgamated Sugar CompanyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1976

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Schuening v. J.R. Simplot & Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1987
  2. Martin v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
  3. Emery v. AdjustcoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
  4. Paine v. Widing TransportationCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API