Grantland v. Wight
Supreme Court of Virginia
AFTER the reversal, by this CouH, of the decree in the ease of Grantland v. Wight,, reported in 2 Munf. 179 — 186, the cause being remanded to the Court of Chancery, with directions, that the Injunction be re-instated, until Wight should 1st. Alleging, that the same was not in compliance with the Decree of the Court of Appeals, “ as it did not appear, “ that the title to the Lot in question was thereby conveyed ; “ it not appearing, that the Testators of the said Wight, or…
Read the full summary
AFTER the reversal, by this CouH, of the decree in the ease of Grantland v. Wight,, reported in 2 Munf. 179 — 186, the cause being remanded to the Court of Chancery, with directions, that the Injunction be re-instated, until Wight should 1st. Alleging, that the same was not in compliance with the Decree of the Court of Appeals, “ as it did not appear, “ that the title to the Lot in question was thereby conveyed ; “ it not appearing, that the Testators of the said Wight, or either “ of them, had the legal title, or that he was duly authorized to “ convey ; and no title papers are exhibited by…
1Opinion of the Court
December 11th, 1816, the President pronounced the Court's opinion, that there was no error in the Decree, which therefore was aflirmed.
2Cited by6 opinions
- Heavner v. MorganWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1887
- Wamsley v. StalnakerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1884
- Davis v. TarwaterSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1854
- Harvey v. RyanWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1906
- Beale v. SeiveleySupreme Court of Virginia · 1837
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.