Legal Opinion

Moody-Rambin Interests v. Moore

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided January 2, 1987No. A14-86-610-CVPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

J. CURTISS BROWN, Chief Justice.

Moody-Rambin Interests, the appellant, sued Thomas Moore (Moore) for unpaid rent and other costs. The trial court in summary judgment held that Moody-Ram-bin Interests was not the correct party to bring suit. In a single point, appellant assigns error in the granting of summary judgment. We dismiss for want of jurisdiction.

Moody-Rambin Interests, a Texas partnership, filed suit against Moore in order to recover unpaid rent and other costs on a lease executed by Moore, as lessee, and USA II Lehndorff and Layne Universal, Inc., as lessor. USA II Lehndorff…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Teer v. DuddlestenTexas Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Hatley v. SchmidtCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1971
  3. Intercity Investments Co. v. PlowmanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1976
  4. Springwoods Shopping Center, Inc. v. University Savings Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1980
  5. Tri-State Ass'n of Credit Men v. HinsonTexas Supreme Court · 1940

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Sixth RMA Partners, L.P. v. SibleyTexas Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Sibley v. Sixth RMA Partners, L.P., Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)2001
  3. Tex-Hio Partnership v. GarnerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2003
  4. Ellis, Johnny Lee v. J. E. Merit Constructors, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2000
  5. James R. Schmidt and Helen Schmidt v. Bastrop County, Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1994

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API