Moody-Rambin Interests v. Moore
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
J. CURTISS BROWN, Chief Justice.
Moody-Rambin Interests, the appellant, sued Thomas Moore (Moore) for unpaid rent and other costs. The trial court in summary judgment held that Moody-Ram-bin Interests was not the correct party to bring suit. In a single point, appellant assigns error in the granting of summary judgment. We dismiss for want of jurisdiction.
Moody-Rambin Interests, a Texas partnership, filed suit against Moore in order to recover unpaid rent and other costs on a lease executed by Moore, as lessee, and USA II Lehndorff and Layne Universal, Inc., as lessor. USA II Lehndorff…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Teer v. DuddlestenTexas Supreme Court · 1984
- Hatley v. SchmidtCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1971
- Intercity Investments Co. v. PlowmanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1976
- Springwoods Shopping Center, Inc. v. University Savings Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1980
- Tri-State Ass'n of Credit Men v. HinsonTexas Supreme Court · 1940
3Cited by6 opinions
- Sixth RMA Partners, L.P. v. SibleyTexas Supreme Court · 2003
- Sibley v. Sixth RMA Partners, L.P., Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)2001
- Tex-Hio Partnership v. GarnerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2003
- Ellis, Johnny Lee v. J. E. Merit Constructors, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2000
- James R. Schmidt and Helen Schmidt v. Bastrop County, Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1994
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.