Legal Opinion

State v. Bouchard

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided March 26, 1985PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WATHEN, Justice.

Robert Bouchard, the defendant, appeals from a judgment of the Superior Court (Aroostook County) entered on the jury’s verdict finding him guilty of arson in violation of 17-A M.R.S.A. § 802 (1983). On the *518day of trial, defense counsel made an oral motion, under M.R.Crim.P. 41A, to suppress a statement made by defendant to a police detective. The presiding Justice ruled that the motion was untimely.1 Defendant argues on appeal that his statement is inadmissible, and alternatively, that it should not have been introduced in the State’s case in chief. We find no error and deny…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Lego v. TwomeySupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. State v. CollinsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1972
  3. State v. MikulewiczSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1983
  4. State v. BishopSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1978
  5. State v. TaylorSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1982

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. NavarroSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1993
  2. State v. HarveySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API