Legal Opinion

State v. Mikulewicz

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided July 14, 1983PublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NICHOLS, Justice.

The central issue on this appeal is whether a confession which resulted from a long custodial interrogation during the course of which law enforcement personnel permitted the Defendant, Theodore Mikulewicz, to consume substantial quantities of alcohol was properly admitted into evidence at the Defendant’s subsequent trial. We conclude that a confession produced under such circumstances is not voluntary and that its admission here violated the right of the Defendant to due process. Therefore, we sustain his appeal.

On the morning of Sunday, October 4, 1981, Donald Dahlstrom was…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Townsend v. SainSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Mincey v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Rochin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  4. Olmstead v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  5. Lego v. TwomeySupreme Court of the United States · 1972

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. State v. CoombsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1998
  2. State v. LarriveeSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1984
  3. State of Maine v. Karl v. KittredgeSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2014
  4. State of Maine v. Timothy M. HuntSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2016
  5. State v. MichaudSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1991

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API