Toms v. Vreeland
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Wayne; Donovan, J. Assumpsit by Sarah S. Toms against Charles T. Vreeland for services, etc., rendered to defendant’s wife. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtMcAlvay, J.
Plaintiff recovered a judgment against defendant in an action of assumpsit for services claimed to have been rendered in boarding, caring for, and providing clothing, medicines, and the services of a physician for the wife of defendant. Defendant asks for a reversal by this court on account of errors claimed to have been committed by the court during the course of the trial. (
The record shows that defendant and his wife lived on a small farm of 30 acres, owned by the entireties, near Eloise, in Wayne’County. The wife was somewhat mentally unbalanced. He desired her cousin, a Mr. Reed, who…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- People v. HareMichigan Supreme Court · 1885
- McDuff v. Detroit Evening Journal Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1890
- Wheeler v. WallaceMichigan Supreme Court · 1884
- Williams v. City of West Bay CityMichigan Supreme Court · 1899
- In re Stockdale's EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1909
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Redmond v. SheerMichigan Supreme Court · 1963