Legal Opinion

United States v. Certain Tracts of Land

District Court, S.D. California

Decided October 13, 1944No. 3128PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

J. F. T. O’CONNOR, District Judge.

This is a condemnation proceeding instituted by the United States. At a pretrial hearing in the above entitled matter, the Government contended that direct testimony of comparable sales is admissible in the Federal Court sitting in California. The Government admits that comparable sales by direct testimony are inadmissible in the State Courts in California on direct examination, and cannot be considered by the jury as evidence of the market value of the condemned real property. The defendants, owners of the property condemned by the Governmerit, insist that…

2Cases cited49 opinions

  1. Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. United States v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  3. Olson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  4. Adams v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
  5. Brown v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1923

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. Certain Parcels of LandDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1953
  2. Van Ornum v. Otter Tail Power CompanyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Remmers v. CiciliotCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
  4. United States v. 25.88 Acres of LandDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1945
  5. Van Ornum v. Otter Tail Power CompanyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API