Legal Opinion · Dissent

Bogigian v. Bogigian

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided March 26, 1990No. 49A02-8908-CV-424Published

1DissentSullivan, Judge

The adage that "hard cases make bad law" 1 might be applied to the case before us. But assuming that the law enunciated is not "bad," the decision nevertheless represents a dramatic change in the law of contracts-more particularly with regard to consideration.

The majority opinion states that consideration must consist of a "bargained-for exchange." In order to meet this test, it is not necessary that the benefit or detriment be negotiated, agreed upon by both parties and reflected by specific language in the instruments. It is sufficient that the detriment or benefit to the particular party…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Northern Securities Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
  2. City of Indianapolis v. KingsburyIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  3. Goeke v. Merchants National Bank & Trust Co. of IndianapolisIndiana Court of Appeals · 1984
  4. Robison v. Fickle, Extr.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1976
  5. Harrison-Floyd Farm Bureau Cooperative Ass'n v. ReedIndiana Court of Appeals · 1989

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API