Legal Opinion

Pearson v. DaimlerChrysler Corp.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided July 22, 2004No. 1-02-3051, 1-02-3402 consPublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hartman

In docket number 1 — 02—3402, plaintiff, Anthony Zenari, appeals from a judgment entered in favor of defendant, DaimlerChrysler Corporation, arguing that the circuit court erred in refusing to give his tendered jury instruction regarding the elements of a breach of express limited warranty claim under the Magnuson-Moss Warranty— Federal Trade Commission Improvement Act (Magnuson-Moss Act or the Act) (15 U.S.C. § 2301 et seq. (2000)). In docket number 1 — 02— 3051, plaintiff, Shannon Pearson, appeals from the circuit court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of defendant, DaimlerChrysler…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Outboard Marine Corp. v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Greer v. Illinois Housing Development AuthorityIllinois Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Sorce v. Naperville Jeep Eagle, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1999
  4. Adams v. J. I. Case Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1970
  5. Gatlin v. RuderIllinois Supreme Court · 1990

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Kim v. Mercedes-Benz, U.S.A., Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2004
  2. Commonwealth Insurance Company v. Titan Tire Corporation v. Pirelli Tire, Llc, Formerly Known as Pirelli Tire Corporation, Formerly Known as Pirelli Armstrong Tire CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004
  3. Evitts v. DaimlerChrysler Motors Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2005
  4. Oggi Trattoria & Caffe, Ltd. v. Isuzu Motors America, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2007
  5. Dewan v. Ford Motor Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2005

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API