Legal Opinion

Votour v. City of Medford

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided February 4, 1957PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCounihan, J.

This is an action of contract brought in a District Court by a police officer of the city of Medford to recover wages due him while incapacitated for work on account of injuries sustained by him in the performance of his duty. G. L. (Ter. Ed.) c. 41, § 111F, inserted by St. 1952, c. 419. 1 There was a finding for the plaintiff and upon a report, claimed by the defendant, the Appellate Division found no prejudicial error and dismissed the report. The action comes here upon an appeal by the city. There was no error.

The city claims to be aggrieved by the denial of certain requests for rulings…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Comeau v. BeckMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946
  2. McAuliffe v. MetcalfeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
  3. Amello's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Jones v. Town of WaylandMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
  2. Willis v. Board of Selectmen of EastonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1989
  3. Jones v. Town of WaylandMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1976
  4. Carvalho v. City of CambridgeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
  5. Holmgren v. LaLiberteMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1976

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API