Legal Opinion

Carvalho v. City of Cambridge

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided April 29, 1977PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBraucher, J.

The plaintiff, a firefighter, was incapacitated for duty because of injury sustained in the performance of his duty, without fault of his own, and hence was granted “leave without loss of pay” under G. L. c. 41, § 111F, as appearing in St. 1964, c. 149. We affirm a decision of the Appellate Division of the District Courts, Northern District, that the fire chief erroneously changed part of the leave period from injured leave to vacation.

The case was tried in a District Court on a statement of agreed facts. The plaintiff inhaled smoke while working at a fire on October 4, 1972, and was placed…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Wormstead v. Town Manager of SaugusMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
  2. Votour v. City of MedfordMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1957
  3. Pettinella v. City of WorcesterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1969

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Willis v. Board of Selectmen of EastonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1989
  2. Rein v. Town of MarshfieldMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1983
  3. Blair v. Board of SelectmenMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1988
  4. Cassidy v. City of NewtonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
  5. Town of Reading v. Reading Patrolmen's Ass'nMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2000

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API