Legal Opinion

Frantz v. Harper

California Supreme Court

Decided October 30, 1900No. S. F. No. 2103PublishedCited by 1 opinion

APPEAL from Superior Court, Del Norte County; F. A. Cutler, Judge. Action by F. Frantz and another, as executors of the estate of H. Gasquet, against J. C. Harper. From a judgment in favor of the plaintiffs the defendant appeals. Affirmed.

1Opinion of the Court

COOPER, C.

This action was originally brought in a justice court. The complaint alleged “that the said defendant is indebted to said estate in the sum of $568.75 for toll, rent of stable, and blacksmith-shop, and boarding men from July 1, 1898, to January 1, 1899, at the agreed price of $87.50 per month; that no part of said sum has been paid, except the sum of $368.25, leaving a balance due and owing from the said defendant to the said plaintiff of $200.50, no part of *561which sum has been paid.” The answer and cross-complaint were intended by the pleader to raise the question of the legality of…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Wilson v. California Central RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  2. People ex rel. Love v. CenterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
  3. People ex rel. Love v. CenterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
  4. Demartin v. DemartinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Woodham v. ClineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API