Legal Opinion

People v. Isaac

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 29, 1976No. Crim. 14392PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

CALDECOTT, P. J.

Appellant was convicted, following a court trial, of violation of Welfare and Institutions Code section 11483 (obtaining by means of false statements aid for a child not entitled thereto in an amount greater than $200) and Penal Code section 118 (perjury). The appeal is from the judgment.

Appellant does not contest any factual matters herein. A brief summary of the facts is as follows:

On January 29, 1973, appellant applied for Aid to Families with Dependent Children (AFDC) and signed under penalty of perjury, a “Statement of Facts Supporting Eligibility for Assistance,”…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. People v. GilbertCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Palermo v. Stockton Theatres, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1948
  3. In Re WilliamsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Merrill v. Department of Motor VehiclesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  5. Madrid v. Justice CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. People v. SimsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  2. People v. JenkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  3. People v. RobertsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
  4. Commonwealth v. WarnerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  5. People v. DomagalskiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API