Legal Opinion
Cacciamani & Rover Corp. v. Banco Popular de Puerto Rico
Supreme Court of The Virgin Islands
Decided August 29, 2014No. S. Ct. Civil No. 2013-0063PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
(August 29, 2014)
CABRET, Associate Justice.
Cacciamani and Rover Architects (“CRA”) appeals the Superior Court’s dismissal of its unjust enrichment claim against Banco Popular de Puerto Rico and BP Sirenusa International, LLC, for allegedly using CRA’s architectural plans without paying for them. 'Because the Superior Court erred in holding that the barred by contract rule precluded CRA’s claim, we reverse and remand for further proceedings.
*250I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
In 2005, Banco Popular gave Enighed Condominiums, Inc., a first priority mortgage loan to build…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Christopher Owens Cynthia Hutchins,plaintiffs-Appellants v. Kaiser Foundation Health Plan,inc., a California Corporation,defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- County Commissioners v. J. Roland Dashiell & Sons, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
- Omnitech International, Inc. v. Clorox Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
- Banks v. International Rental & Leasing Corp.Supreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2011
- Morris Pumps v. Centerline Piping, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2007
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Rennie v. Hess Oil Virgin Islands Corp.Supreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2015
- Vanterpool v. Government of the Virgin IslandsSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2015
- Frank C. Pollara Group, LLC v. Ocean View Investment Holding, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2015
- King v. AppletonSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2014
- Isaac v. CrichlowSuperior Court of The Virgin Islands · 2015
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.