State v. Tirado
Court of Appeals of Utah
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
CHRISTIANSEN, Judge:
¶1 William Tirado (Defendant) challenges his conviction on one count of arranging the distribution of a controlled substance, a second degree felony. 1 Specifically, he contends that he received constitutionally ineffective assistance of counsel because his attorney labored under a conflict of interest arising from the concurrent representation of Defendant’s cousin (Cousin) on related charges. Defendant seeks (1) reversal of his conviction(s) and remand for a new trial or (2) remand for an evidentiary hearing pursuant to rule 23B of the Utah Rules of Appellate…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Mickens v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- State v. LitherlandUtah Supreme Court · 2000
- Layton City v. CarrCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2014
- State v. GriffinUtah Supreme Court · 2015
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- State v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2023
- State v. CrespoCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2017
- State v. BalfourCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2018
- State v. GallegosCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2018
- State v. MasonCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2024
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.