Legal Opinion

People v. Bostick

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 24, 1986PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In viewing the totality of the circumstances under which the statements of the defendant were obtained (see, People v Anderson, 42 NY2d 35, 38), the voluntariness of the statements in question was established beyond a reasonable doubt (see, People v Yarter, 41 NY2d 830, cert denied 433 US 910). In addition, we are persuaded that even if it is assumed that the defendant did in fact suffer from some form of mental condition, he could still be found to have voluntarily and rationally waived his constitutional rights, having understood the Miranda warnings (see, People v Mathis, 77 AD2d 720).

Furth…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. PellegrinoNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. People v. NixonNew York Court of Appeals · 1967
  3. People v. AndersonNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
  4. People v. MathisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. CapelaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  2. People v. DurantAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  3. People v. CapelaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API