Legal Opinion
Smith v. Baptiste
Supreme Court of Georgia
Decided March 15, 2010No. S09A1543Published
1Opinion of the Court
694 S.E.2d 83 (2010)
SMITH et al.
v.
BAPTISTE et al.
No. S09A1543.
Supreme Court of Georgia.
March 15, 2010.
Greenberg Traurig, Mark G. Trigg, Ryan C. Grelecki, Atlanta, for appellants.
Molden, Holley & Thompson, Regina Sledge Molden, Oni A. Holley, Atlanta, for appellees.
Powell Goldstein, Eric P. Schroeder, LeeAnn Jones, William V. Custer IV, Charles M. Cork, Jr., Atlanta, amici curiae.
CARLEY, Presiding Justice.
Salon Baptiste and Cheryl Baptiste (Appellees) filed a complaint for damages against Chuck Smith and WQXI 790 AM (Appellants), based on allegedly defamatory statements made by Smith and…
Also in this document: Concurrence; Dissent.
2Cases cited59 opinions
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- District of Columbia v. HellerSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Citizens United v. Federal Election CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- Washington State Grange v. Washington State Republican PartySupreme Court of the United States · 2008
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.