Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Spire v. Beermann

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided May 18, 1990No. 89-738PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an original action concerning the alleged unconstitutionality of §§ 6 to 11 of 1989 Neb. Laws, L.B. 247, of the Ninety-first Legislature, First Session, which legislation is now codified as Neb. Rev. Stat. §§ 85-1,118 to 85-1,123 (Supp. 1989).

Neb. Const. art. V, § 2, provides, in part: “No legislative act shall be held unconstitutional except by the concurrence of five judges.”

Four judges of this court are of the opinion that the legislation in question is unconstitutional, while three judges of this court are of the opinion that the legislation is constitutional.

Therefore, since five…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. State v. CoppleNebraska Supreme Court · 1987
  2. State ex rel. State Railway Commission v. RamseyNebraska Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Dwyer v. Omaha-Douglas Public Building CommissionNebraska Supreme Court · 1972
  4. State Ex Rel. Spire v. Northwestern Bell Telephone Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Board of Regents of the University of Nebraska v. ExonNebraska Supreme Court · 1977

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Haman v. MarshNebraska Supreme Court · 1991
  2. State Ex Rel. Spire v. ConwayNebraska Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Pig Pro Nonstock Cooperative v. MooreNebraska Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Upper Big Blue Natural Resources District v. City of FremontNebraska Supreme Court · 1993
  5. State Ex Rel. Stenberg v. Douglas Racing Corp.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1994

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API