Bailey v. Crum
Supreme Court of Florida
1Opinion of the CourtEllis, P. J.
This in an appeal from a decree vacating and setting aside an order pro confesso and final decree both entered in the same suit in which the final decree appealed from was entered upon the ground that the complainant in the suit, Richard L. Bailey, had not nor had anyone in his behalf complied with the requirement of Section 4219, Com piled General Laws, 1927, in relation to the locality of actions.
• That section provides that suits shall be begun only in the county, where the defendant resides or where the cause of action accrued or where the property in litigation is. It also provides that…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Bucki v. ConeSupreme Court of Florida · 1889
- Williams v. Peninsular Grocery Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1917
- McKinnon v. the First National Bank of PensacolaSupreme Court of Florida · 1919
- Morgan v. EatonSupreme Court of Florida · 1910
- Russ v. MitchellSupreme Court of Florida · 1865
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- McMullen v. McMullenDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1960
- Permenter v. Bank of Green Cove SpringsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1962
- Singer v. TobinDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1967
- Winchester v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1961
- Smith v. KnightDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.