Tashjian v. Forderer Cornice Works
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
GILBERT, Circuit Judge.
The patent involved in this appeal was issued to the appellant November 28, 1922, letters patent 1,-437,324. It relates to an element employed in the construction of buildings, and it is designated “a combined conduit, junction box, and outlet box.” Its purpose is to provide improved means to meet the requirements of electrical installations in office buildings and other buildings for electrical lights, telephones, signal devices, etc. It had been a common practice to effect such installations by three- instrumentalities, junction boxes, conduit members, and outlet…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Topliff v. TopliffSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Pickering v. McCulloughSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
- Risdon Iron & Locomotive Works v. MedartSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- International Mausoleum Co. v. SievertCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1914
- Riter-Conley Mfg. Co. v. AikenCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1913
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- General Time Corp. v. Hansen Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1952
- Park-In Theatres, Inc. v. RogersCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1942
- Alexander Anderson, Inc. v. EastmanDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1936
- Collins v. EmersonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1936
- Wolff v. Jordan Marsh Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1935
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.