Legal Opinion

Williams v. State

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided March 14, 2005No. 25950PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Per curiam

We granted certiorari to review a post-conviction relief (PCR) order granting respondent a new capital sentencing proceeding, finding his trial counsel was ineffective in failing to request a “plain and ordinary” meaning jury charge. 1 We find that counsel’s performance was deficient, but that there is no evidence of resulting prejudice. We therefore reverse the PCR order.

FACTS

Respondent was convicted of murdering his wife and his son and received two death sentences. His direct appeal was affirmed. State v. Williams, 321 S.C. 327, 468 S.E.2d 626 (1996). At the PCR hearing, trial counsel…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1996
  3. Southerland v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1999
  4. Sellers v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2005

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Smalls v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2018
  2. Jamison v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2014
  3. Briggs v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2017
  4. Stone v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2017
  5. Williams v. OzmintSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2008

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API