Minor Michael Still v. United States Marshal, United States Parole Commission and Denver Sheriff's Department
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
McKAY, Circuit Judge.
After examining the briefs and the appellate record, this three-judge panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not be of material assistance in the determination of this appeal. See Fed.R. App.P. 34(a), Tenth Circuit R. 10(e). The cause is therefore submitted without oral argument.
The issue presented by this appeal is whether the United States Parole Commission has the statutory authority to withdraw a parole violator warrant, once it has been executed, and hold it in abeyance pending the disposition of the state charges which form the basis for the…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Crowell v. BensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Moody v. DaggettSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- National Labor Relations Board v. Catholic BishopSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- St. Martin Evangelical Lutheran Church v. South DakotaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Ex Parte CanadaCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
- Nelson Sinclair v. Gary L. Henman, Warden, Leavenworth Federal Prison, and United States Parole CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
- Ronnie Howard v. CaufieldCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2014
- Cronn v. BuffingtonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1998
- Bufford McDonald v. New Mexico Parole BoardCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.