Legal Opinion

In Re the Marriage of Stachofsky

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided February 19, 1998No. 15573-1-III, 16813-1-IIIPublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKurtz, J.

Robert Stachofsky is employed by Albert-son’s, Inc., and when he became part of its management team, he was rewarded with valuable stock options. In his marital dissolution proceeding, the court determined Albertson’s stock shares purchased with community funds through stock options that had vested during the marriage were community property. The court further determined unexercised Albertson’s stock options that were acquired during the marriage but vested after separation were 50 percent community property and 50 percent Mr. Stachofsky’s separate property. Mr. Stachofsky appeals the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Friedlander v. FriedlanderWashington Supreme Court · 1972
  2. In Re the Marriage of LandryWashington Supreme Court · 1985
  3. In Re the Marriage of CrosettoCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1996
  4. In Re the Marriage of ShortWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  5. In Re the Marriage of KonzenWashington Supreme Court · 1985

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. In re the Marriage of FioritoCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002
  2. In re the Marriage of GriswoldCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002
  3. In Re Marriage of GriswoldCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002
  4. In re the Marriage of WhiteCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001
  5. In re the Marriage of DavisonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API