Kilgore v. Black Stone Oil Co.
Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DAVID FARRIS, Justice (Assigned).
In this suit for conversion of oil and gas and title to minerals, the appellants raise four issues. Issue one complains of the trial court’s grant of summary judgment applying stare decisis to a case this Court decided some eighty-three years ago in W.T. Carter & Bro. v. Collins, 192 S.W. 316 (Tex.Civ.App.- — Beaumont 1916, writ refd). Based upon the doctrine of stare decisis as it is applied to cases involving the determination of boundary lines, we conclude the trial court did not err in granting the summary judgment in question. Because of this…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Gulf Land Co. v. Atlantic Refining Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1939
- Trapp v. Shell Oil Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1946
- Swilley v. McCainTexas Supreme Court · 1964
- Renwar Oil Corporation v. LancasterTexas Supreme Court · 1955
- Railroad Commission v. Magnolia Petroleum Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1937
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Madera Production Co. v. Atlantic Richfield Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2003
- Ramsey v. Grizzle, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2010
- Swepi, L.P. v. Camden Resources, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2004
- In Re Kerr, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)2009
- Conley v. Comstock Oil & Gas, LPCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2011
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.