Legal Opinion
Nazar v. Branham
Kentucky Supreme Court
Decided August 27, 2009No. 2004-SC-001015-DG. 2005-SC-000834-DGPublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court by
Special Justice JEFFREY C. MANDO.
This is an appeal from a defense verdict in a medical malpractice action. Appel-lee/Cross-Appellant, Sheila Branham as Executrix of the Estate of Roe Branham [hereinafter “Branham”] alleges that Appellant/Cross-Appellee, Dr. Gregory B. Nazar [hereinafter “Dr. Nazar”] committed medical malpractice by failing to remove an object from Roe Branham’s scalp following surgery. The alleged professional negligence occurred at Norton Audubon Hospital [hereinafter “Norton”] on February 27, 2000 during an operation in which a malignant tumor was…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Steelvest, Inc. v. Scansteel Service Center, Inc.Kentucky Supreme Court · 1991
- Hilen v. HaysKentucky Supreme Court · 1984
- Williams v. Kentucky Department of EducationKentucky Supreme Court · 2003
- Clark v. Hauck Manufacturing Co.Kentucky Supreme Court · 1995
- Barnett's Administrator v. BrandCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1915
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Insight Kentucky Partners II, L.P. v. Preferred Automotive Services, Inc.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 2016
- Savage v. Three Rivers Medical CenterKentucky Supreme Court · 2012
- Southard v. BelangerDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2013
- Baxter v. AHS Samaritan Hospital, LLCCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2010
- Dexter v. HanksCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2019
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.