Castleman v. Du Val
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Appeal from a judgment of the Baltimore City Court. (Phelps, J.)
1Opinion of the CourtSchmucker, J.
The main question presented by this appeal is whether under the terms of the lease appearing in the record the rent thereby reserved was payable in advance. The lease was made in writing, under seal, from the appellee to the appellant, on October 12th, 1897. Its material part, being the clause fixing the length of the term and reserving the rent, is as follows : “ For the term of eleven months, beginning 07t the twentieth day of October, l8pj, mid endiiig on the twentieth day of Septeviber, i8p8, at $641.63 (dolíais) a — payable $58.33 on the 20th day of each and eveiy month.” A subsequent…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Ringgold v. RinggoldCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1826
- Stockham v. StockhamCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1870
- Dixon v. ClayvilleCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1876
- Hutchins v. DixonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1857
- Deyo v. BleakleyNew York Supreme Court · 1856
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Markoff v. KreinerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1941
- In re Estate of DaltonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1918
- Isquith v. AthanasDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1943
- Smathers v. Standard Oil Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922
- Fifer v. HooverCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1933
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.