Legal Opinion
Perkins v. National Express Corp.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided May 15, 2015No. Case No.14-cv-02347-NCPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
SUMMARY JUDGMENT ORDER
Re: Dkt. No. 63
NATHANAEL M. COUSINS, United States Magistrate Judge
Defendants National Express Corporation, Durham School Services, L.P., and Petermann Ltd. (collectively “Durham”) and Kirk Tostenrude move for summary judgment on plaintiff Jimmy Perkins’ claims for racial discrimination, hostile work environment, breach of contract, invasion of privacy, violation of California’s Unfair Competition Law, and wrongful termination. Perkins’ action stems from a drug test that Durham required Perkins to take on November 13, 2012, in accordance with the company’s policy of…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Guz v. Bechtel National, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2000
- Francisco Vasquez v. County of Los Angeles, Erroneously Sued as Los Angeles County Board of SupervisorsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Posey v. School District No. 1 in the County of Denver and State of ColoradoDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2024