Legal Opinion

State v. Imlay

Utah Supreme Court

Decided June 1, 1900PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from the Sixth District Court Garfield County. Hon. W. M. McCarty, Judge. Defendant was prosecuted for and convicted of the crime of assault with intent to commit rape, and from the judgment entered on tbe conviction has appealed to this court.

1Opinion of the CourtBartch, C. J.

The defendant was prosecuted for and convicted of the crime of assault with intent to commit rape. IJpon being sentenced to imprisonment in the state prison for a term of eighteen months, he appealed to this court, and has assigned numerous errors, alleged to have been committed during the trial of the cause, The accused was charged with having perpetrated the offense on the 1st day of July, 1899, upon the person of Kate Judd, a girl fifteen years of age. From the proof, however, it appears that the crime was committed on the 8th of June, 1899.

The appellant in the first instance challenges…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Stephen v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1852
  2. People v. GageMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
  3. State v. De WolfSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1830
  4. McMath v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1875
  5. State v. KinneySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1876

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Callahan v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1917
  2. Trimble v. Territory of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1903
  3. State v. KeeneySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1922
  4. El Pueblo v. AngladaSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1914
  5. People v. AngladaSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1914

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API