Callahan v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
GILBERT, Circuit Judge.
The plaintiff in error was convicted of the crime of rape committed upon a girl under the age of consent. It is contended that the court below erred in overruling a demurrer to the indictment for *516its failure to allege that the act was done “with her consent.” We find no merit in the contention. 33 Cyc. 1444, and cases there cited.
All person^ who had no business before the court were by the order of the court excluded from the courtroom during the trial, but litigants, witnesses, jurors, counsel, officers of the court, and representatives of the newspapers were allowed…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Reagan v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1913
- State v. SargentOregon Supreme Court · 1897
- State v. PollardSupreme Court of Missouri · 1903
- McMurrin v. RigbySupreme Court of Iowa · 1890
- Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1899
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- United States v. KobliCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1949
- Tanksley v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1944
- Ralph Geise v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1958
- State v. SchmitSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
- State v. PurvisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1968
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.