Vasquez v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MORRISON, Judge.
The offense is delivery of heroin, a controlled substance; the punishment, 10 years.
By ground of error one, appellant contends that the indictment against him is fundamentally defective and will not sup*911port his plea of guilty under Sec. 4.03(a) of the Texas Controlled Substances Act, Vernon’s Ann.Civ.St. because it fails to contain the word “unlawfully”.1
Reliance, among other authorities, is had upon our opinion in Jansson v. State, 473 S.W.2d 40, wherein we said:
“In this case the motion to revoke does not allege facts which would necessarily constitute a violation of…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Jansson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1971
- Adam v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1973
- Cevalles v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1974
- United States v. Raul Miranda, AKA 'Wimpy,'Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
- Ross v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1925
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- McNew v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1978
- Pollan v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1981
- Sims v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1990
- Garcia v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1994
- Austin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1975
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.