Legal Opinion
Wagner v. Menke
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided June 19, 1935No. 486PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
*502OPINION
By BARNES, PJ.
The petition in error sets out twelve separate specifications of error. In the brief of counsel for plaintiff in error these are reclassified and special stress is given to specifications 8, 9 and 10.
Specification No. 8 is based on claimed error in the refusal of the court to give special instructions numbers 2, 3, 4 and 5 before argument.
Specification No. 9 is based on the refusal of the court to incorporate in its charge a request made by the plaintiff on the question of construing the contract.
Specification No. 10 relates to claimed error in the charge of fe court.
OPINI…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Vickrey v. MaierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
- Newhall v. Western Zinc Min. Co.California Supreme Court · 1912
- Park v. WhitneyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1889
- Hoffman v. Bloomsburg & Sullivan R. R.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893
- Kaplan v. Reid Bros., Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1930
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Turner Brooks of Ohio, Inc. v. Bowling Green State UniversityOhio Court of Claims · 1989