Legal Opinion

City of Pittsburgh v. Sloan

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 18, 2001Published

1Opinion of the Court

SMITH, Judge.

The City of Pittsburgh / Frank Gates Services Company (City) appeals from an order of the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County that reversed the decision of an Arbitrator and awarded Lieutenant Shirley Sloan benefits with interest under the act commonly known as the Heart and Lung Act, Act of June 28, 1935, P.L. 477, as amended, 53 P.S. §§ 637-638. The City contends that the Arbitrator correctly determined that Sloan did not sustain an injury in the performance of her duties because she failed to demonstrate an abnormal working condition to support her mental injury claim.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Martin v. Ketchum, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  2. Archer v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  3. Philadelphia Newspapers, Inc. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  4. Andracki v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  5. City of Pittsburgh v. KisnerCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2000

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API