Legal Opinion

Sorokach v. Trusewich

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided October 13, 1953PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*366The opinion of the court was delivered by

Wacheneeld, J.

The plaintiff instituted this action as executrix of her husband’s estate, seeking a determination and payment of his share of the assets of a partnership of which he was a member in his lifetime. He was formerly a stockholder of the corporation formed in 1932 bearing the name Arrow Clothing Co., Inc., having six equal shareholders. The corporation was dissolved in 1943 and a partnership was formed known as the Arrow Clothing Company, consisting of the former shareholders as equal partners, carrying on the same business as the predecessor…

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. Wilzig v. SisselmanNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1982
  2. Sorokach v. TrusewichNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1955
  3. Watson v. LuntNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Benson v. RubinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
  5. Schmitz v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1978

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API