Legal Opinion
Noriega & Alexander v. United States
District Court, E.D. California
Decided May 17, 1994No. CV-F-93-5160 RECPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER RE UNITED STATES’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
COYLE, Chief Judge.
On April 18, 1994, the court conducted further oral argument in connection with the United States’ Motion for Summary Judgment. The court had heard the motion on January 31, 1994 and ordered additional briefing on February 8, 1994.1
Upon due consideration of the written and oral arguments of the parties and the record herein, the court grants this motion for the reasons set forth herein.
This is an interpleader action brought by the law firm, Noriega & Alexander, against the United States acting on behalf of the Internal…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- United States v. City of New BritainSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- United States Ex Rel. Internal Revenue Service v. McDermottSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- United States v. Equitable Life Assurance Soc. of United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Abex Corporation v. Ski's Enterprises, Inc. And United States of America v. Walton Shim and Sandra ShimCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- Millers Mutual Insurance Association Of Illinois v. Richard WassallCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1984
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Monica Fuel, Inc. v. Internal Revenue ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
- Aluisi v. KolkkaDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2006
- Monica Fuel, Inc. v. Internal Revenue ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
- Monica Fuel, Inc. v. Internal Revenue ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
- The Bank of New York Mellon v. DavidsonDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2019