Legal Opinion
Stanford v. State
Supreme Court of Florida
Decided February 25, 1959PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
110 So.2d 1 (1959)
Steve STANFORD, Ray C. Fillyaw, Robert G. Rowell, Appellants,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Supreme Court of Florida.
February 25, 1959.
Rehearing Denied April 16, 1959.
William Victor Gruman, Tampa, for appellants.
Richard W. Ervin, Atty. Gen., and Odis M. Henderson, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.
DREW, Justice.
The three appellants and one Cullen Horace Williams were duly informed against, tried and convicted by a jury of armed robbery.[1]
Although various errors are assigned, only one question is presented for our consideration. That question is whether the trial judge abused his…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Ross v. OregonSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- State v. RossOregon Supreme Court · 1909
- Commonwealth. v. GarramoneSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
- Brown v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1943
- State v. RamirezIdaho Supreme Court · 1921
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Stone v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1979
- Booker v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1987
- Albert E. Paschal v. Louie L. Wainwright, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1984
- Chavigny v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1959
- O'DONNELL v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1975
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.