Legal Opinion

Federal National Mortgage Ass'n v. Rhodes

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided November 22, 2013No. 1120824PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MURDOCK, Justice.

Jeffery S. Rhodes and Allison E. Rhodes petition this Court for a writ of mandamus directing the Covington Circuit Court to dismiss the ejectment action filed against them by the Federal National Mortgage *317Association (“Fannie Mae”). We deny the petition.

I. Procedural History

The relevant facts for disposition of this mandamus petition are not disputed and include the following:

“On or about March 12, 2012, [the Rhodeses] received a letter dated March 7, 2012 from the law firm of McFadden, Lyon & Rouse, L.L.C. stating that ‘Bank of America, N.A., has instructed our law firm to…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Ex Parte United Service Stations, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1993
  2. Ex Parte Liberty Nat. Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2002
  3. Ex Parte ZiglarSupreme Court of Alabama · 1995
  4. Ex Parte CarterSupreme Court of Alabama · 2001
  5. Ex Parte McWilliamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 2001

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. McElroy v. Hubbard Properties, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2016
  2. Adler v. Bank of New York MellonCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2016
  3. Goldstein v. Cont'l Motors, Inc. (In re Cont'l Motors, Inc.)Supreme Court of Alabama · 2018
  4. Goldstein v. Cont'l Motors, Inc. (In re Cont'l Motors, Inc.)Supreme Court of Alabama · 2018
  5. Har-Mar Collision, Inc. v. Scottsdale Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2015

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API