Federal National Mortgage Ass'n v. Rhodes
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
MURDOCK, Justice.
Jeffery S. Rhodes and Allison E. Rhodes petition this Court for a writ of mandamus directing the Covington Circuit Court to dismiss the ejectment action filed against them by the Federal National Mortgage *317Association (“Fannie Mae”). We deny the petition.
I. Procedural History
The relevant facts for disposition of this mandamus petition are not disputed and include the following:
“On or about March 12, 2012, [the Rhodeses] received a letter dated March 7, 2012 from the law firm of McFadden, Lyon & Rouse, L.L.C. stating that ‘Bank of America, N.A., has instructed our law firm to…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Ex Parte United Service Stations, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1993
- Ex Parte Liberty Nat. Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2002
- Ex Parte ZiglarSupreme Court of Alabama · 1995
- Ex Parte CarterSupreme Court of Alabama · 2001
- Ex Parte McWilliamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 2001
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- McElroy v. Hubbard Properties, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2016
- Adler v. Bank of New York MellonCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2016
- Goldstein v. Cont'l Motors, Inc. (In re Cont'l Motors, Inc.)Supreme Court of Alabama · 2018
- Goldstein v. Cont'l Motors, Inc. (In re Cont'l Motors, Inc.)Supreme Court of Alabama · 2018
- Har-Mar Collision, Inc. v. Scottsdale Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2015
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.