Legal Opinion

Chatham v. . Realty Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 8, 1920PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ALLEN, J., dissenting; BROWN, J., concurring in the dissenting opinion. At February Term, 1917, of Mecklenburg, Paul Chatham and the Charlotte Rapid Transit obtained judgment against the defendant, the Mecklenburg Realty Company, for $10,000 and interest from date of judgment. On appeal, this was affirmed with modification that the judgment should bear interest from 19 May, 1913, the date of the contract sued upon, and not from the first day of the trial term as in actions for tort, where the verdict does not expressly allow interest. A petition to rehear was denied. Execution upon the…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Scovill v. ThayerSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  2. Hawkins v. GlennSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  3. Kellogg Bridge Co. v. HamiltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  4. Dawson Bank v. HarrisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1881
  5. McIver v. Young Hardware Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1907

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ingram v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  2. Armour Fertilizer Works v. NewbernSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
  3. United States v. AdamsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API